⌗ Service
Trademark Opposition & Defence
- Duration
- Variable — 6 months to 3 years
- Official Fee
- Opposition fee + (if required) court fee
Your trademark application is published for 2 months in the Official Trademark Bulletin; during this window, third parties may file oppositions. Even after registration, an invalidity action may be filed within 5 years. This page explains the defence procedures, how they are conducted, and the factors that move the success rate.
§1 Three defence scenarios
Deficiency notice (TÜRKPATENT) — a document or classification issue during formal examination. Response window: 2 months; your attorney files the correction.
Absolute-grounds refusal (TÜRKPATENT) — refusal under SMK art. 5. Appeal window: 2 months. Re-examination request and administrative appeal via the Re-Examination and Evaluation Board (YİDK).
Third-party opposition / invalidity action — the holder of an earlier registered mark challenges your application. The case is decided within the settled likelihood-of-confusion doctrine of the Court of Cassation 11th Civil Chamber.
§2 The likelihood-of-confusion test
Under the 11th Civil Chamber's settled 2024 case law, the assessment turns on four core criteria:
- Visual, phonetic and conceptual similarity between the signs
- Overlap in the nature of the goods/services and the relevant consumer group
- Distinctiveness and reputation of the earlier mark
- Average attention level of consumers (contextual to the product category)
In every defence file Asil prepares, each criterion receives its own argument, evidence and precedent.
§3 Defence process
- Defence preparation in the 1–2 months after service of the opposition/action
- Written defence + evidence submission (before the YİDK)
- If necessary: expert opinions, sector research, prior-use documentation
- YİDK decision — if unfavourable, administrative court action (Ankara Administrative Court)
- Subsequent appeal to the Council of State (Danıştay)
- In parallel, an invalidity action before the Intellectual and Industrial Property Civil Courts
§4 Anonymised case
A Kayseri food brand received an opposition from a well-known İstanbul brand. The product categories differed (cheese vs charcuterie) but the class overlapped. Through the YİDK and administrative-court process, the file we built on sector differentiation, consumer attention level and prior-use evidence was decided against the opposition 26 months later — i.e. our client's registration was preserved. Asil handled the file from start to finish.
— Salih Aksebzeci, from a 2022–2024 file (anonymised)
§5 FAQ
Should I panic when an opposition arrives? · How much is the defence fee? · How long does a court action take? · What can the opponent do if their opposition is dismissed? · How is well-known mark protection invoked in defence? · What is prior-use right and how is it proven? · How long is the Court of Cassation appeal? · How do I transfer my file when switching to Asil?
Sources
- SMK No. 6769 art. 18 (absolute grounds), arts. 25-29 (invalidity)
- Court of Cassation 11th Civil Chamber likelihood-of-confusion case law (2024)
Author: Salih Aksebzeci · TÜRKPATENT Agent Registry No. 188 · Last updated: 2026-05-14
